Who Are They Fooling?

Apparently much of the “job growth” from the BLS is, well, based on more than a small degree of wishful thinking and assumptions based on obsolete economic models. I think that many of the “people in charge” believe if that they can fool enough people that good times are happening they will actually happen.  That saying that there is full employment means that there will actually be full employment.  After all their Ivy Professors told them that that was the way it worked.  Well the only people they have been fooling is themselves and reality asserts itself in the end.  As this post following demonstrates.

A crucial characteristic of the world that could make both the politicians’ dreams of power and your dreams of secure retirement come true would be the resumption of rapid economic growth — as reflected in both GDP accounting and employment reports.

Unhappily, the news on that score is far from encouraging…

In fact, a close reading of the data suggests that economic growth is negligible, and the real unemployment rate is about 23%.

That is the Shadow Government Statistics alternative unemployment rate for May 2016. Quite a contrast with the headline “official” unemployment rate of 4.7%.

Fake Jobs - Unemployment Data

But upon inspection, you can see that the alarming 23% ShadowStats unemployment rate is merely unemployment calculated as it was until the Kennedy administration, when out-of-work Americans who had suspended an active search for jobs — primarily because none could be found — were relabeled “discouraged workers” and dropped from the tally of the unemployed.

The Clinton administration widened the memory hole further.

In 1994, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) redefined the workforce to exclude all but the small percentage of the discouraged who had been seeking work for less than a year. The longer-term discouraged — some 4 million U.S. adults — disappeared into a statistical black hole.

Clinton also reduced the sample-sized employed in the household survey that determines the unemployment rate — excluding a disproportionate share of inner-city households who were less likely to have jobs.

Over the years, American politicians have used statistical sleight of hand to protect themselves from the angry mobs of voters in a way that the witch doctors and high priests of the past could only envy.

In the old days, when the rains didn’t come and the crops failed, the high priests could not fool anyone by merely issuing a proclamation thanking the gods for bumper crops.

Today, Obama proclaims a “vigorous recovery” and The New York Times pretends to believe it.

But wait…

If you are a connoisseur of government press releases — and you actually believe them — you may imagine that the U.S. has been enjoying a “vigorous recovery,” as Barack Obama never tires of pretending.

Perhaps you were even convinced by the report of the U.S. unemployment rate falling from 5% in April 2016 to 4.7% in May 2016?

That is what the government reported.

But a closer look at the data reveals something else.

The decline of 484,000 unemployed persons reflected a mere 26,000 unemployed persons finding employment and 458,000 unemployed falling into a statistical “black hole.”

458,000 People Disappeared From the Labor Force

This highlighted a record monthly surge of 664,000 persons of working age dropping out of the workforce. As of May, workforce dropouts hit a record high of 94.7 million.

In other words, the reason that the unemployment rate fell was that lots of people were either defined into a “black hole” or voluntarily left the workforce.

No Hiring Surge

To the contrary, the headline gain of 38,000 net jobs reported in the Labor Department’s payroll survey was comprised entirely of fake jobs.

John Williams of Shadow Government Statistics has parsed the BLS numbers carefully. He reports that the BLS inflates its monthly account of new hires with approximately 200,000 fake jobs, including jobs conjured up by its so-called “Birth/Death Model” that are meant to account for new employment in startup companies that are too new to count.

Notwithstanding the fact that the BLS has been adding an average of 200,000 fake jobs to the monthly payroll report in recent years (as confirmed by the March 2015 benchmark downside revisions that subtracted 206,000 jobs), the actual employment picture has become so weak that they have brazenly added additional monthly upside biases.

That’s why Donald Trump says: “Only ‘dummies’ believe Fed’s unemployment figure.”

Donald Trump has tried to advance the national conversation by underscoring a point that should be evident to any thinking person. Namely, that the “recovery” the establishment is so keen to have you embrace is a fraud.

If elected president, Trump promises to draw back the veil of statistical flummery that disguises reality for credulous people. Trump is the first candidate in my memory to say he “will investigate the veracity of U.S. economic statistics produced by Washington — including ‘the way they are reported.’”

No wonder the establishment hates him.

As George Orwell, the author of 1984, put it: “The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”

Let’s look more closely to see why my comments and those of Donald Trump on the employment situation are not merely impudent name-calling, but sober conclusions informed by the facts.

Start with the issue of business dynamism that lies at the heart of a lot of statistical mischief in government pronouncements on the job market.

As economists Ian Hathaway and Robert E. Litan pointed out in research conducted for the Brookings Institution: “Historically one new business is born about every minute, while another one fails every 80 seconds.”

That was then.

Since the Great Recession, not so much. Now there are more failures than startups.

Business dynamism in the U.S. has been in long-term decline, so not all of the recent problems of entrepreneurial stagnation could be fairly attributed to Barack Obama. Nonetheless, extensive research shows that the old ratio of business births to deaths no longer holds.

The rate of business dynamism collapsed when the subprime bubble popped. Obama’s presidency is the first to see more firms go out of business than created. As you will readily understand, it makes a difference in a supposed “economic recovery” if business deaths run considerably ahead of new firm formations.

You might think that if the Brookings Institution can figure out that more firms are going out of business than are being created, then that insight should not elude the BLS. But it has, primarily because it gives the lie to the fake job strength the BLS ballyhoos every month.

Obama’s bean counters add about 200,000 (now 224,000) imaginary jobs each month through the “Birth/Death” model that continues to suppose — contrary to the evidence — that more jobs were created in new firms (births) than lost in firms going out of business (deaths). These fake jobs account for a big percentage of the growth in employment announced by the BLS.

The bottom line is that at least 4.5 million jobs announced during the Obama presidency never existed. They were statistical adjustments inserted in the data reflecting outdated historical ratios that no longer hold true.

But this is only part of the story.

The Brookings data, along with surveys conducted by Gallup, show that far from adding 200,000 jobs through the “Birth/Death” model, a more accurate report would have subtracted 70,000 jobs a month to account for the jobs that disappeared when firms died.

That would be another 840,000 annual jobs (or 2.5 million jobs subtracted since 2014). All told, 6.95 million (or 75%) of the officially announced 9.15 million jobs supposedly created through the first quarter of 2016 were fake.

I should point out that might actually be a low estimate, as the BLS inflates jobs estimates with seasonal-adjustment shenanigans that result in double counting of the same fake jobs, and other frauds that are too complicated to get into here.

Fake Employees Are Not Paid

You don’t need to be a Nobel Prize-winning economist to realize that fake employees cannot form the basis of a strong economy. Employers are not writing checks to employees that don’t exist outside of statistical models. The income those imaginary employees would be earning if they were real is not being spent at the businesses that are going out of business by the hundreds of thousands each year.

And, inevitably, if business deaths continue to outstrip business formations in an environment of slack consumer demand, the result to be expected is economic collapse.

Evidence of this is the growing tally of corporate debt defaults that normally precedes a recession. Both Moody’s and Deutsche Bank are predicting a surge in corporate debt defaults, perhaps as high as the 12 to 15% range typical of recessions.

That could be why financial stocks have been underperforming.

Declining Productivity Reflects Fake Jobs

Yet another telltale hint of the large number of fake jobs is the declining productivity that seems to puzzle so many mainstream economists.

Duh. Of course productivity is disappointing.

The millions of fake employees aren’t actually doing much heavy lifting, are they? The fake jobs obviously skew the denominator for calculating productivity growth. All the actual work is done by real employees who show up, not by statistical hypotheses.

A Turn for the Worse?

Be smart about it. You owe it to yourself to think about what it means when the government announces an increase of just 38,000 payroll jobs in a month when they ramped up the total of fake jobs to 224,000.

The mainstream economists took a variety of tacks to explain and rationalize this. Some blamed the Verizon strike for the weak payroll number. Others took the ridiculous view that an increase of only 38,000 payroll jobs in the month meant the U.S. economy was approaching “full employment,” meaning that wages would soon rise rapidly. What piffle!

You can do the arithmetic. And even if you can’t, John Williams has done it for you.

Williams reports: “Net of heavy seasonal distortions and bias factors, May payrolls likely plunged by about 200,000 (-200,000).”

Far from getting stronger, the economy is lurching to the downside. The politicians can disguise some of the weakness with dishonest statistics. Even so, reality inevitably begins to shine through.

Adjust your portfolio to reflect the rising prospect of acute weakness in an already bankrupt economy.

http://thesovereigninvestor.com/us-economy/fake-jobs-plague-u-s-economy/

All I can say is that if you want to know the truth, just walk down the local shopping street or look for a job.  In this dysfunctional economy we have right now,  the depth of what’s happening isn’t measured in rosy statistics from Washington.  It’s measured in the frustrated people on sites like Linked in, the games that employers are playing  trying to find the “perfect fit” because they don’t want to admit that it’s not business as usual and they know that they really don’t want to hire anyway, and all the “for lease” signs you see in every shopping street and mall. I lived through the 1980’s and this is NOT what prosperity looks like.

For more on the dysfunctional economy click Here or on the tag below.

 

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. pops1918 · June 26, 2016

    Whenever my class gets into looking at unemployment, the very first thing I teach is that the unemployment rate is *NOT* as simple as it seems. It’s essential to understand what the number tells you – and what it does *not* tell you.

    Overall, GDP growth is a better indicator of how the economy is doing – though it’s best to look at inflation alongside it. Unemployment is handy, too, though the way they report it currently means there are a few related numbers you have to know to get a clear picture of it, like the Labor Participation Rate and average work week.

    Going by just the unemployment rate, someone who works two days a week delivering pizza is considered to be just as employed as a senior investment analyst who makes six figures and works fifty-plus hours a week – and full-time students (with no outside job) aren’t part of the unemployment picture at all.

    Like

    • jccarlton · June 26, 2016

      The fact that the part time low value jobs are considered with the high value jobs producing real service and product is part of the great deception the people in charge are doing. I’m not even sure that they are doing it consciously. I’ve see enough of those people in action and I honestly think that they have no clue about what they are supposed to be experts at. They just act on what they learned at whatever Ivy Covered Snob Factory they graduated from without ever questioning their preconceptions. The thing is that if you look at people Not In Labor Force, the labor participation rate, the business starts/business closing and some indicators like the transport indexes and the rosy picture that they see in Washington is actually pretty ugly.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s