If a hypothesis can’t be checked experimentally, then it can’t be tested and testing is the essence of physics.
Should physics theories be tested – or just accepted? So asks essay the in New York Times
Adam Frank and Marcelo Gleiser discuss whether Physics has moved beyond the need to be checked. Their essay (Sunday New York Times 2015-Jun-7) is on science vs empirical evidence (experimental verification)
“Today our most ambitious science can seem at odds with the empirical methodology that has historically given the field its credibility”
“How did we get to this impasse?” they ask. Then they discuss the Higgs particle that generates a core part of any particle’s mass. It was predicted 50 years ago and measured last year.
The Higgs is the “lynchpin of … the Standard Model” of particle physics, a powerful mathematical theory that is known to contain problems, but can not be extended. New theories have elegant math, are each hailed as “the”…
View original post 2,847 more words